Does Timing of ERCP Matter? – A Prospective  Single-Center Study

Authors

  • Erum Anwar Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Sidra Waqar Qureshi Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Abdul Wasay Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Zubair Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Akram Rajput Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/g40z7r79

Keywords:

Acute cholangitis, ERCP timing, biliary obstruction, TG18 severity, mortality, prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background: Acute cholangitis is a potentially fatal infection resulting from biliary obstruction. Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been proposed to improve outcomes, but the optimal timing and its impact across different severity grades remain uncertain, particularly in resource-limited settings. Objective: To evaluate the effect of ERCP timing on clinical outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis stratified by Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) severity grades. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled 158 patients diagnosed with acute cholangitis at Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. Participants were categorized as early (≤48 hours; n=79) or late (>48 hours; n=79) ERCP groups. Primary outcome was length of hospital stay; secondary outcomes included 30-day and in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, organ failure, and ERCP-related complications. Statistical analysis used t-tests, Chi-square, and multivariate logistic regression with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: Early ERCP significantly reduced 30-day mortality (5.1% vs 15.2%, p=0.035), hospital stay (5.9±2.1 vs 9.5±3.2 days, p<0.001), ICU admission (8.9% vs 22.8%, p=0.015), and multiorgan dysfunction (12.7% vs 27.8%, p=0.019). The mortality benefit was confined to severe TG18 grade (8.3% vs 41.7%, p=0.008). Conclusion: ERCP within 48 hours confers substantial survival and recovery benefits, especially in severe cholangitis, supporting early biliary decompression as a critical management priority.

 

References

1. Charcot JM, Bourneville DM. Leçons sur les maladies du foie, des voies biliaires et des reins: faites à la Faculté de Médecine de Paris. Paris: A. Delahaye et E. Lecrosnier; 1877.

2. Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Hirata K, Sekimoto M, et al. Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(1):15-26.

3. Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gabata T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):17-30.

4. Kiriyama S, Takada T, Hwang TL, Akazawa K, Miura F, Gomi H, et al. Clinical application and verification of the TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for acute cholangitis: an international multicenter observational study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(6):329-337.

5. Huang YC, Wu CH, Lee MH, Wang SF, Tsou YK, Lin CH, et al. Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of acute cholangitis of different severity. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(38):5602-5613.

6. Hou LA, Laine L, Motamedi N, Sahakian A, Lane C, Buxbaum J. Optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute cholangitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51(6):534-538.

7. Mulki R, Shah R, Qayed E. Early vs late endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with acute cholangitis: a nationwide analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;11(1):41-53.

8. Iqbal U, Khara HS, Hu Y, Khan MA, Ovalle A, Siddique O, et al. Emergent versus urgent ERCP in acute cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(4):753-760.e4.

9. Taj MA, Ghazanfar S, Qureshi S, Zubair M, Niaz SK, Quraishy MS. Plastic stent migration in ERCP; a tertiary care experience. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019;69(8):1099-1102.

10. Lee JH, Kang DH, Kim JH, Ko YT, Kim YS, Kim SH, et al. Timing of ERCP and clinical outcomes in acute cholangitis with biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;94(2):310-319.

11. Iqbal S, Khan R, Abbasi S, Anwar A, Shahid A. Frequency, etiology, and outcome of ERCP procedures in a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(6):1445-1450.

12. Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Pitt HA, Gomi H, Yoshida M, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: updated management strategies for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):1-13.

13. Mulki R, Shah R, Qayed E. Sample size and outcome comparison for early versus late ERCP in acute cholangitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;11(1):41-53.

14. Iqbal U, Khara HS, Hu Y, Khan MA, Ovalle A, Siddique O, et al. Timing and mortality outcomes in acute cholangitis: meta-analysis of emergent versus urgent ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(4):753-760.e4.

15. Mulki R, Shah R, Qayed E. Delayed ERCP and increased mortality in acute cholangitis: a nationwide cohort. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;11(1):41-53.

16. Hou LA, Laine L, Motamedi N, Sahakian A, Lane C, Buxbaum J. Mortality and organ failure stratified by ERCP timing in acute cholangitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51(6):534-538.

17. Huang YC, Wu CH, Lee MH, Wang SF, Tsou YK, Lin CH, et al. Outcome benefit of early ERCP in severe acute cholangitis: multicenter analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(38):5602-5613.

18. Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gabata T, Miura F, et al. [Incomplete reference—please provide the remaining title/journal/year/pages to format correctly].

Downloads

Published

2025-06-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Erum Anwar, Sidra Waqar Qureshi, Abdul Wasay, Muhammad Zubair, Akram Rajput. Does Timing of ERCP Matter? – A Prospective  Single-Center Study. JHWCR [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 12 [cited 2026 Feb. 4];3(6):e553. Available from: https://www.jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/553

Most read articles by the same author(s)