Formulation Design, Response Surface Methodology-Based Optimization And Characterization Of Linseed Oil Emulgel for Skin Care

Main Article Content

Huda Javed
Syed Nisar Hussain Shah
Aousaf Ahmad
Muhammad Imran Qureshi
Hina Akram
Yaqoot Tariq
Syeda Rida Nisar Bukhari
Mughisa Munir
Misbah Rafique

Abstract

Background: Linseed oil is a lipophilic natural oil with potential topical utility, but its poor aqueous solubility and formulation limitations require an appropriate semisolid delivery system. Emulgels provide a suitable platform for incorporating oil-based active ingredients while maintaining spreadability, consistency, and topical acceptability. Objective: This study aimed to formulate, optimize, and characterize linseed oil-loaded oil-in-water emulgels using response surface methodology, with rose oil and lemon oil evaluated as formulation variables. Methods: Thirteen emulgel formulations were prepared using Carbopol-940 as the gelling polymer, Tween 20 and Span 20 as surfactants, propylene glycol as a co-solvent, and varying concentrations of rose oil and lemon oil. Formulations were evaluated for physicochemical characteristics, pH, viscosity, spreadability, extrudability, drug yield, drug content, FTIR compatibility, thermal behavior, in-vitro release through a cellophane membrane, release kinetics, response surface model fit, in-vitro SPF, preliminary antimicrobial activity, skin-irritation observation, and accelerated stability. Results: All formulations were smooth, homogeneous, transparent, and free from visible phase separation, with pH values of 6.7–6.8 ± 0.1 and viscosity ranging from 640 × 10³ to 671 × 10³ cps. EG6, containing 0.75 g rose oil and 1.8 g lemon oil, showed the highest 24-hour cumulative release of 96.69 ± 0.01%. The RSM model was significant (p = 0.0394), and the quadratic effect of rose oil was significant (p = 0.0321), indicating a nonlinear release response. SPF values ranged from 14.56 ± 0.01 to 19.9 ± 0.01, and EG6 showed 85% antimicrobial inhibition with no visible irritation in ten volunteers over seven days. Conclusion: EG6 demonstrated the most favorable preliminary formulation performance within the tested design space, supporting further ex-vivo, microbiological, dermatological, and in-vivo evaluation of linseed oil emulgel

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Huda Javed, Syed Nisar Hussain Shah, Aousaf Ahmad, Muhammad Imran Qureshi, Hina Akram, Yaqoot Tariq, et al. Formulation Design, Response Surface Methodology-Based Optimization And Characterization Of Linseed Oil Emulgel for Skin Care. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 9 [cited 2026 Jun. 10];4(11):1-13. Available from: https://www.jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1711

References

1. Shah SWA, et al. Innovative transdermal drug delivery systems: benefits, challenges, and emerging application. BMEMat. 2025:e70001.

2. Nikolaev B, et al. Nano- and microemulsions in biomedicine: from theory to practice. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(7):1989.

3. Kumar V, et al. Transdermal drug delivery systems. In: Advanced Drug Delivery: Methods and Applications. Springer; 2023. p. 333-62.

4. Dash A, Singh S. Pharmaceutics: basic principles and application to pharmacy practice. Elsevier; 2023.

5. Musakhanian J, Osborne DW, Rodier JD. Skin penetration and permeation properties of Transcutol® in complex formulations. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024;25(7):201.

6. Mahajan DKC, et al. Preparation and assessment of multifunctional herbal cream.

7. Shim YY, et al. Health benefits of flaxseed and its peptides (linusorbs). Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(7):1845-64.

8. Thompson LU, Cunnane SC, editors. Flaxseed in human nutrition. AOCS Press; 2024.

9. Bera D, Lahiri D, Nag A. Studies on a natural antioxidant for stabilization of edible oil and comparison with synthetic antioxidants. J Food Eng. 2006;74(4):542-5.

10. Levang AK, Zhao K, Singh J. Effect of ethanol/propylene glycol on the in vitro percutaneous absorption of aspirin, biophysical changes and macroscopic barrier properties of the skin. Int J Pharm. 1999;181(2):255-63.

11. Ghayour A. A methodology for measuring the characteristic curvature of technical-grade ethoxylated nonionic surfactants: the effects of concentration and dilution. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2023;60(1):1-12.

12. Devi A. Pharmaceutical design and in vitro evaluation of a dual layer valproic acid tablet for enhanced therapeutic efficacy and controlled drug release. J Neonatal Surg. 2025;14(31s).

13. Ersanli Ç. Essential oil loaded collagen hydrogels to battle bacterial infections for tissue engineering applications. 2025.

14. Kanika K, et al. Bi-layer tablets: pioneering novel drug delivery systems. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2025;12(XII).

15. Al-Ameri AAF, Al-Gawhari FJ. Formulation development of meloxicam binary ethosomal hydrogel for topical delivery: in vitro and in vivo assessment. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(7):898.

16. Prete S, et al. Natural and synthetic polymeric biomaterials for application in wound management. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(9):455.

17. Shingare DM, et al. Formulation and evaluation of transferosmal gel of levetiracetam. BioNanoScience. 2023;15(2):1-19.

18. Selçuk Pekdemir S, et al. Nature-derived otolith loaded polyethylene glycol-polycaprolactone electrospun composite nanofiber membranes: preparation, characterization, and biocompatibility evaluation. Iran Polym J. 2025:1-14.

19. Quadir SS. Bioresorbable polymers for wound healing. In: Bioresorbable Polymers and Their Composites. Elsevier; 2024. p. 353-83.

20. Cheng Z, et al. Optimizing fluconazole-embedded transfersomal gel for enhanced antifungal activity and compatibility studies. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1353791.

21. Wang S, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of a hindered phenol-linked benzophenone hybrid compound as a potential polymer anti-aging agent. Antioxidants. 2024;13(8):894.

22. Tiwari A, et al. Analytical method development and validation of beclomethasone dipropionate and fusidic acid in pure and pharmaceutical dosage form (cream) by RP-HPLC. Res J Pharm Technol. 2024;17(1):327-32.

23. Kumar A, Saravanan K. Rapid dissolving film as platform for drug delivery systems: a review. Int J Pharm Sci. 2024;3(8):2881-912.

24. Mekasha YT, et al. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles for different brands of albendazole boluses. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024;25(1):48.

25. Salih OS, Al-Akkam EJ. Preparation, in-vitro, and ex-vivo evaluation of ondansetron loaded invasomes for transdermal delivery. Iraqi J Pharm Sci. 2023;32(3):71-84.

26. Prasad N, et al. Processing of natural gums and resins. In: Natural Gums and Resins: Botany and Sustainable Uses in Medicine, Nutrition, Perfumery and Cosmetics. CABI; 2025. p. 217-64.

27. Martin T, Allgöwer F. Data-driven system analysis of nonlinear systems using polynomial approximation. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2023;69(7):4261-74.

28. Sayre RM, Agin PP, LeVee GJ, Marlowe E. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro testing of sunscreening formulas. Photochem Photobiol. 1979;29(3):559-66.

29. Viswanadhan Vasantha P, et al. Combination of cellulose derivatives and chitosan-based polymers to investigate the effect of permeation enhancers added to in situ nasal gels for the controlled release of loratadine and chlorpheniramine. Polymers. 2023;15(5):1206.

30. Imran S, Munir S, Altemimi A, Fatima I, Rabail R, Batool I, et al. Therapeutic implications of flaxseed peptides and bioactive components against various diseases. J Funct Foods. 2024;119:106324.