Frequency of Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Complications of Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Main Article Content

Saira Shafi
Mahrukh Bhullar
Inam Ullah
Sumbal Shahbaz

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is a commonly performed major gynecological procedure, but it may be associated with important intra-operative and post-operative complications that influence patient safety, recovery, and healthcare burden. Objective: To determine the frequency and pattern of intra-operative and post-operative complications among patients undergoing abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy at Farooq Hospital, Lahore. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional observational study included 84 women aged 20–60 years who underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy during a four-month study period. Patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy were excluded. Data were collected using a structured proforma and included demographic characteristics, parity, surgeon-related variables, type of hysterectomy, indication for surgery, intra-operative complications, and post-operative complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0 and summarized as frequencies and percentages. Results: Abdominal hysterectomy was performed in 48 patients (57.1%) and vaginal hysterectomy in 36 patients (42.9%). The most common indications were fibroid uterus (26.2%), heavy bleeding (23.8%), and prolapse (21.4%). Intra-operative complications occurred in 65 patients (77.4%), most commonly bowel injury and pelvic bleeding (15.5% each), followed by bladder injury (14.3%) and ureteric injury (13.1%). Post-operative complications occurred in 69 patients (82.1%), most commonly wound infection (14.3%), anuria (13.1%), and hematoma (11.9%). Conclusion: Hysterectomy was associated with a considerable intra-operative and post-operative complication burden in this cohort. Route-wise complication reporting and inferential analysis are recommended in future studies.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Saira Shafi, Mahrukh Bhullar, Inam Ullah, Sumbal Shahbaz. Frequency of Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Complications of Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 28 [cited 2026 Apr. 28];4(8):1-7. Available from: https://www.jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1527

References

1. Afroz S, Ara G. Comparison of intra operative and post operative complications between non descent vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. J Enam Med Coll. 2018;8(3):128-34. doi:10.3329/jemc.v8i3.38361.

2. Akbar Hossain KF, Rahman MM, Datta SR. Comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative clinical study at a tertiary hospital in southern Bangladesh. KYAMC J. 2024;15(1):40-5.

3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease: Committee Opinion No. 701. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001968.

4. Benassi F, et al. Randomized comparison of vaginal and abdominal routes for hysterectomy in large uterine fibroids. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102(2):151-6.

5. Bukhari L, Bukhari A, Albakri O, Alshamrani A, Abduljabbar H. Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases: retrospective review. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;6:761-8.

6. Geller E, et al. Comparison of intra-operative complication rates of abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2008;23(3):161-7.

7. Garry R, et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: abdominal vs laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy outcomes. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1383-93.

8. Kayastha S, Tuladhar H. Vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy: comparative study. Nepal Med Coll J. 2006;8(4):259-62.

9. Kumar S, Garg S, McCracken G. Comparative outcomes of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies. Clin Outcomes J. 2016;12(2):45-53.

10. Shahbaz S, Howard N. Anaesthesia delivery systems in low and lower-middle-income Asian countries: a scoping review of capacity and effectiveness. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024;4(3):e0001953.

11. Shahbaz S, Zakar R, Fischer F, Howard N. Professional obstacles to anaesthesiology practice in Punjab, Pakistan: qualitative study of consultant anaesthesiologists’ perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13427.

12. Shahbaz S, Zakar R, Howard N. Anaesthesia provision challenges in public hospitals of Pakistan’s Punjab province: a qualitative study of expert perspectives. BMJ Open. 2023;13(12):e075108.