Frequency of Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Complications of Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Hysterectomy is a commonly performed major gynecological procedure, but it may be associated with important intra-operative and post-operative complications that influence patient safety, recovery, and healthcare burden. Objective: To determine the frequency and pattern of intra-operative and post-operative complications among patients undergoing abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy at Farooq Hospital, Lahore. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional observational study included 84 women aged 20–60 years who underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy during a four-month study period. Patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy were excluded. Data were collected using a structured proforma and included demographic characteristics, parity, surgeon-related variables, type of hysterectomy, indication for surgery, intra-operative complications, and post-operative complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0 and summarized as frequencies and percentages. Results: Abdominal hysterectomy was performed in 48 patients (57.1%) and vaginal hysterectomy in 36 patients (42.9%). The most common indications were fibroid uterus (26.2%), heavy bleeding (23.8%), and prolapse (21.4%). Intra-operative complications occurred in 65 patients (77.4%), most commonly bowel injury and pelvic bleeding (15.5% each), followed by bladder injury (14.3%) and ureteric injury (13.1%). Post-operative complications occurred in 69 patients (82.1%), most commonly wound infection (14.3%), anuria (13.1%), and hematoma (11.9%). Conclusion: Hysterectomy was associated with a considerable intra-operative and post-operative complication burden in this cohort. Route-wise complication reporting and inferential analysis are recommended in future studies.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Afroz S, Ara G. Comparison of intra operative and post operative complications between non descent vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. J Enam Med Coll. 2018;8(3):128-34. doi:10.3329/jemc.v8i3.38361.
2. Akbar Hossain KF, Rahman MM, Datta SR. Comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative clinical study at a tertiary hospital in southern Bangladesh. KYAMC J. 2024;15(1):40-5.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease: Committee Opinion No. 701. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001968.
4. Benassi F, et al. Randomized comparison of vaginal and abdominal routes for hysterectomy in large uterine fibroids. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102(2):151-6.
5. Bukhari L, Bukhari A, Albakri O, Alshamrani A, Abduljabbar H. Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases: retrospective review. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;6:761-8.
6. Geller E, et al. Comparison of intra-operative complication rates of abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2008;23(3):161-7.
7. Garry R, et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: abdominal vs laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy outcomes. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1383-93.
8. Kayastha S, Tuladhar H. Vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy: comparative study. Nepal Med Coll J. 2006;8(4):259-62.
9. Kumar S, Garg S, McCracken G. Comparative outcomes of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies. Clin Outcomes J. 2016;12(2):45-53.
10. Shahbaz S, Howard N. Anaesthesia delivery systems in low and lower-middle-income Asian countries: a scoping review of capacity and effectiveness. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024;4(3):e0001953.
11. Shahbaz S, Zakar R, Fischer F, Howard N. Professional obstacles to anaesthesiology practice in Punjab, Pakistan: qualitative study of consultant anaesthesiologists’ perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13427.
12. Shahbaz S, Zakar R, Howard N. Anaesthesia provision challenges in public hospitals of Pakistan’s Punjab province: a qualitative study of expert perspectives. BMJ Open. 2023;13(12):e075108.