Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy and Treatment Outcomes of Emerging Clinical Protocols in Managing Complex Internal Medicine Disorders

Authors

  • Mon Yee Htet Paing Master of Medicine in General Practice, Department of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Author
  • Muhammad Numair Kashif Pharmacist, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. Author
  • Lal Shehbaz Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ziauddin University and Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Author
  • Shaikh Khalid Muhammad Professor of Medicine, Chandka Medical College Teaching Hospital, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana, Pakistan. Author
  • Muhammad Haseeb Shaikh Student, Isra University, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan Author
  • Shazia Ilyas Senior Registrar, Department of Medicine, Kharadar General Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/xpzwg037

Keywords:

Clinical protocols; Diagnostic concordance; Clinical decision support; Internal medicine; Length of stay; Readmission; Retrospective cohort

Abstract

Background: Complex internal medicine admissions are prone to diagnostic discordance and variable treatment outcomes, particularly in high-volume tertiary settings, motivating the adoption of structured, technology-assisted clinical protocols to standardize diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. Objective: To evaluate whether emerging protocol-based care is associated with improved diagnostic concordance and better inpatient and short-term post-discharge outcomes compared with conventional care among adults with complex internal medicine disorders. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted across tertiary care teaching hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan, over a 12-month period. Adult inpatients (n=300) managed under internal medicine services were classified by documented care pathway into emerging protocol-based care (n=152) or conventional care (n=148). Primary diagnostic performance was assessed as diagnostic concordance between the initial working diagnosis within 24 hours and the final adjudicated discharge diagnosis. Outcomes included clinical improvement at discharge (CGI-I 3), length of stay, in-hospital complications, and 30-day readmission. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity burden, disease category, and baseline severity. Results: Diagnostic concordance was higher with emerging protocols (90.8% vs 81.1%; risk difference 9.7%, 95% CI 2.8–16.6; p=0.006). Clinical improvement was more frequent (84.2% vs 69.6%; OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.36–4.03; p=0.002), length of stay was shorter (5.8±1.9 vs 8.4±2.3 days; mean difference 2.6, 95% CI 3.1 to 2.1; p<0.001), and 30-day readmissions were lower (7.9% vs 14.9%; OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23–0.99; p=0.046). Protocol-based care independently predicted favorable outcomes (adjusted OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.44–4.22; p=0.001). Conclusion: Emerging protocol-based care was associated with improved diagnostic concordance and clinically meaningful gains in efficiency and short-term outcomes in complex internal medicine admissions.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Mon Yee Htet Paing, Muhammad Numair Kashif, Lal Shehbaz, Shaikh Khalid Muhammad, Muhammad Haseeb Shaikh, Shazia Ilyas. Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy and Treatment Outcomes of Emerging Clinical Protocols in Managing Complex Internal Medicine Disorders. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 15 [cited 2026 Feb. 4];4(1):e1177. Available from: https://www.jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1177

Most read articles by the same author(s)