Development and Evaluation of the Physicochemical Properties of Fenugreek Energy Bars and Their Relationship with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous reproductive and metabolic disorder in which healthy lifestyle and dietary management are important components of care. Fenugreek contains fiber and bioactive compounds that have attracted interest in metabolic nutrition, but incorporation into foods requires simultaneous consideration of composition and palatability. Objective: To develop fenugreek-containing energy bars and evaluate their physicochemical, total phenolic, and sensory characteristics as a preliminary functional-food formulation potentially relevant to dietary strategies for women with PCOS. Methods: Four formulations were prepared: a peanut-butter-containing control (T0) and three fenugreek formulations containing 5% (T1), 10% (T2), or 15% (T3) fenugreek powder. Moisture, protein, fat, fiber, ash, carbohydrate, and total phenolic content were evaluated. Fifteen panelists aged 20–35 years assessed appearance, taste, aroma, texture, and overall acceptability using a 9-point hedonic scale. Results: Moisture, protein, fiber, ash, and total phenolic content increased across T0–T3, while fat decreased modestly. T3 had the highest fiber (2.90±0.11%), ash (1.56±0.07%), and total phenolic content (57.4±1.6 mg GAE/100 g). Corrected carbohydrate-by-difference values were 61.15%, 59.87%, 59.83%, and 59.04% for T0–T3, respectively. Sensory distributions showed T0 as the most highly rated overall formulation; among fenugreek-containing bars, T2 had the greatest overall acceptability, while T3 had markedly poorer ratings. Conclusion: Fenugreek-containing bars with measurable fiber and phenolic content were successfully formulated. A 10% fenugreek formulation provided the best sensory balance among the fenugreek-enriched products. Clinical effects in PCOS were not evaluated and require dedicated intervention studies.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Teede HJ, Tay CT, Laven JJE, Dokras A, Moran LJ, Piltonen TT, et al. Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(10):2447–2469. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgad463.
2. Neven ACH, Forslund M, Ranasinha S, Sethi P, Dhungana RR, Mousa A, et al. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome: a global and regional systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2026;32(3):277–312. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmaf030.
3. March WA, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Phillips DIW, Norman RJ, Davies MJ. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(2):544–551.
4. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome revisited: an update on mechanisms and implications. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(6):981–1030.
5. Zhao H, Zhang J, Cheng X, Nie X, He B. Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome across various tissues: an updated review of pathogenesis, evaluation, and treatment. J Ovarian Res. 2023;16(1):9. doi:10.1186/s13048-022-01091-0.
6. Bril F, Ezeh U, Amiri M, Hatoum S, Pace L, Chen YH, et al. Adipose Tissue Dysfunction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;109(1):10–24. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgad356.
7. Zeber-Lubecka N, Ciebiera M, Hennig EE. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Oxidative Stress—From Bench to Bedside. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):14126. doi:10.3390/ijms241814126.
8. Cowan S, Lim S, Alycia C, Pirotta S, Thomson R, Gibson-Helm M, et al. Lifestyle management in polycystic ovary syndrome—beyond diet and physical activity. BMC Endocr Disord. 2023;23(1):14. doi:10.1186/s12902-022-01208-y.
9. Juhász AE, Stubnya MP, Teutsch B, Gede N, Hegyi P, Nyirády P, et al. Ranking the dietary interventions by their effectiveness in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2024;21(1):28. doi:10.1186/s12978-024-01758-5.
10. Roberfroid MB. Global view on functional foods: European perspectives. Br J Nutr. 2002;88(Suppl 2):S133–S138. doi:10.1079/BJN2002677.
11. Ma ZF, Liu S, Fu C, Zhou S, Lee YY. Functional Foods in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: Innovations, Evidence and Challenges. Foods. 2026;15(4):764. doi:10.3390/foods15040764.
12. Basch E, Ulbricht C, Kuo G, Szapary P, Smith M. Therapeutic applications of fenugreek. Altern Med Rev. 2003;8(1):20–27.
13. Visuvanathan T, Than LTL, Stanslas J, Chew SY, Vellasamy S. Revisiting Trigonella foenum-graecum L.: Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potentialities. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(11):1450. doi:10.3390/plants11111450.
14. Kim J, Noh W, Kim A, et al. The effect of fenugreek in type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):13999. doi:10.3390/ijms241813999.
15. Mirgaloybayat S, Akbari Sene A, Jayervand F, et al. Comparison of the effect of fenugreek and metformin on clinical and metabolic status of cases with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized trial. J Reprod Infertil. 2024;25(2):120–132. doi:10.18502/jri.v25i2.16040.
16. Yu J, Xia J, Yang C, Pan D, Xu D, Sun G, et al. Effects of Oat Beta-Glucan Intake on Lipid Profiles in Hypercholesterolemic Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients. 2022;14(10):2043. doi:10.3390/nu14102043.
17. Özcan MM. A review on some properties of almond: impact of processing, fatty acids, polyphenols, nutrients, bioactive properties, and health aspects. J Food Sci Technol. 2023;60(5):1493–1504. doi:10.1007/s13197-022-05398-0.
18. Ahmad Z, Ilyas M, Ameer K, Khan M, Waseem M, Shah FUH, et al. The influence of fenugreek seed powder addition on the nutritional, antioxidant, and sensorial properties of value-added noodles. J Food Qual. 2022;2022:4940343. doi:10.1155/2022/4940343.
19. Latimer GW Jr, editor. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. 22nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2023. doi:10.1093/9780197610145.001.0001.
20. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265–275.
21. Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965;16(3):144–158. doi:10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144.
22. Moskowitz HR, Sidel JL. Magnitude and hedonic scales of food acceptability. J Food Sci. 1971;36(4):677–680. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1971.tb15160.x.
23. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Fontana AJ Jr, Schmidt SJ, Labuza TP, editors. Water Activity in Foods: Fundamentals and Applications. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2020. doi:10.1002/9781118765982.
24. Bilbie C. Setup of ASLT Parameters for Evaluation of the Shelf-Life for the New Dry Snack Food Product. Chem Proc. 2022;7(1):75. doi:10.3390/chemproc2022007075.